CMS Proposes Cut In Medicare Advantage Payments

INSURERS FORESEE MUCH DEEPER MA SPENDING CUTS

ABOVE VIDEO: FOX News reports on the impact of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicare Advantage spending cuts on the almost 16 million seniors who have opted for the popular alternative programs that provide better benefits and higher quality coverage than the traditional fee-for-service Medicare.

EDITOR’S NOTE: About a year ago, we posted an editorial from the Wall Street Journal that warned the administration against implementing the Medicare Advantage (MA) budget cuts that are part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA, aka Obamacare). At that time, it was reported that $306 billion over 10 years was slated to be taken out of MA, a popular private insurance alternative to traditional Medicare that offers more flexibility than the standard federal Medicare plan, is offered by more than 3,000 private plans and serves nearly 16 million beneficiaries, of which over 40,000 live in Brevard County. 

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) announced on Friday that it is proposing to cut Medicare Advantage payments by 1.9 percent, significantly less than previously projected.

However, over the next few years, provisions in Obamacare will continue to reduce payments to Medicare Advantage plans until they are in line with the cost of traditional Medicare, with the savings contributing to the law’s economic equation to help pay for subsidies for people buying plans on the health insurance exchanges.

Disputes surrounding what the MA changes will ultimately actually look like and the political dynamics surrounding MA spending cuts in an election year are explored in the Kaiser Health News report below. As in 2012, the Obama administration again will be under intense political pressure to moderate the proposed 2015 MA cuts when they are finalized in April to avoid political liability for Democrats in tough congressional races in November.

—Dr. Jim Palermo, Editor-in-Chief

KAISERHEALTHNEWS.ORG—An Obama administration announcement about payment rates for Medicare Advantage plans in 2015 has set off a dispute about how large – or small – the changes really are.

Late Friday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced proposed rates that officials said could mean payment reductions of 1.9 percent for the private plans in the program.

But insurers, who have led a fierce lobbying campaign against payment reductions, say the Medicare Advantage plans would sustain a far deeper cut. That’s because the lower payment rates will be combined with new health law fees on health plans, a phase-out of the “star rating” system that helped buffer the reductions for Medicare Advantage plans in prior years and Medicare cuts in the automatic federal spending cuts known as “sequestration.”

One insurance industry official, who asked to be not identified Sunday because his organization was still analyzing the impact of the CMS announcement, estimated that Medicare Advantage plans would see their rates drop by a total 6 percent next year.

CMS said Friday its preliminary estimate is “the combined effect of the Medicare Advantage growth percentage and the fee-for-service growth percentage.”

In a statement, the industry group America’s Health Insurance Plans’ (AHIP) also noted that a number of factors impact Medicare Advantage payment rates. “The growth rate percentage included in the rate notice is only one factor and does not represent what the total cut will be when other factors are included,” AHIP said.

Despite industry concerns in recent years about cuts in federal funding, the program continues to grow. Enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans rose in 2014 by 8.9 percent to 15.9 million enrollees, up from 14.6 million in 2013, according to a new analysis from consulting firm Avalere Health. Approximately 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in the plans, which are offered by private insurance companies.

The government provides payments to the insurers for Medicare-covered benefits, such as hospital and physician services, but the plans often offer extra benefits, such as hearing aids or gym memberships, that are not available in traditional Medicare. Most Medicare Advantage plans require that beneficiaries receive care from physicians, hospitals and other providers that contract with those plans. Traditional fee-for-service allows beneficiaries to visit any doctor or provider that accepts Medicare.

Insurers and other Medicare Advantage advocates said earlier this month that cuts could cause premium increases and benefit reductions.

For years, Medicare Advantage plans were paid on average more per beneficiary than what Medicare paid for beneficiaries enrolled in traditional fee-for-service. The health law aims to equalize that federal spending over time, so the government pays the same amount whether a beneficiary enrolls in Medicare Advantage or traditional Medicare.

Cuts to Medicare Advantage plans are part of the $716 billion in Medicare spending reductions the health law calls for over the next decade.

Those cuts were strong ammunition for Republicans in the 2010 congressional midterm elections when the GOP recaptured the House and in the 2012 presidential contest. In a recent flurry of letters to the administration, both Democrats and Republicans have expressed concerns about the impending cuts.

Republicans wasted no time Friday criticizing the proposed cuts. “The hard truth is now apparent – millions of seniors who rely on the Medicare Advantage program will lose the plans, benefits, doctors and financial protection they currently have,”  said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said the proposed reductions “threaten a successful program for seniors, and must be overturned.  Medicare Advantage is extremely popular for a reason – run through the private market, seniors gain access to high-quality and coordinated care with additional benefits that they otherwise wouldn’t get.  Regrettably, this administration continues to undermine this critical program.”

But others say the payment changes are needed. “The reductions should continue to go into effect in order to ensure more parity between [Medicare Advantage] plans and traditional Medicare with respect to how much is spent on beneficiaries,” the Center for Medicare Advocacy wrote Thursday.

“Further, if overall Medicare costs continue to grow more slowly than expected, which is good news for Medicare and the federal budget, [Medicare Advantage] payment should be adjusted accordingly. There is no reason [Medicare Advantage] payment should increase at the same time that overall Medicare costs are slowing,” it added.

The costs of plans – and the additional benefits they may offer — vary widely around the country.  Insurers UnitedHealthcare and Humana make up more than 40 percent of Medicare Advantage enrollees.

Similar Stories